What now for the SEBI after Ordinance lapse?

DeekshaSinghIn July and September last year, the Securities Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2013 (“the Ordinance”) was promulgated to amend three key components of the securities law statutory framework—the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, and the Depositories Act, 1996.

The Ordinance was expected to enable the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) to effectively enforce the existing statutory and regulatory framework. We have discussed the provisions of the Ordinance here and here.

Despite being promulgated twice however, the Ordinance lapsed earlier this month and now cannot be reissued. What does this mean for the SEBI?

Diminished powers

Sections 10, 15, and 21 of the Ordinance had enhanced the power of the SEBI to take strict action against defaulters, including:

– attachment and sale of movable property;

– attachment of bank accounts;

– attachment and sale of  immovable property;

– arrest and detention in prison; and

– appointing a receiver for the management of the movable and immovable properties.

New-Programme-LaunchExercising the new powers it had been seeking for a long time, the regulator passed over 300 attachment orders for recovering close to Rupees 1,700 crore from defaulters. The lapsing of the Ordinance will not affect these orders, as they were made while the Ordinance was still in effect. However, the SEBI cannot pass such orders any longer even for defaults that may have occurred while the Ordinance was still in effect. While SEBI can adjudicate and declare fines and penalties against defaulters, they can no longer proceed against the property of defaulters or carry out arrests for non-compliance with orders.

New regulations

The Ordinance gave additional powers to the SEBI including the power to conduct search and seizure of persons and premises. The SEBI could also call for information and records relevant for information, including telephone call data records. Pursuant to the establishment of these new powers, the SEBI had, earlier this month, also issued the SEBI (Procedure for Search and Seizure) Regulations, 2014. Naturally, now that the SEBI no longer has the powers of search and seizure (more about those powers here), these regulations are no longer relevant.

At the same time that the search and seizure regulations were issued, SEBI had also issued the SEBI (Settlement of Administrative and Civil Proceedings) Regulations, 2014. These regulations established a proper procedure for cases involving settlement, including eligibility for settlement, application and so on. The SEBI Chief has expressed the view that the settlement regulations mentioned above were issued while the Ordinance was in effect, and therefore, they continue to have the force of law.

My view is that while the SEBI Chief may be right about any settlements made under the regulations while the Ordinance was still in effect, the argument cannot be extended to mean that the SEBI has the power to issue settlement orders under the regulations now. The Preamble to the regulations clearly states:

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 15JB of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, section 23JA of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and section 19-IA of the Depositories Act, 1996 read with section 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, section 31 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and section 25 of the Depositories Act, 1996, the Securities and Exchange Board of India hereby makes the following regulations to provide for the terms of settlement and the procedure of settlement and matters connected therewith or incidental thereto, namely:

The sections mentioned in the initial part of the Preamble were all inserted by the Ordinance, and since the Ordinance has now lapsed, these regulations cannot be made applicable to proceedings against defaulters. The SEBI should issue a revised set of regulations for now, without making reference to the amended sections introduced by the Ordinance.

The lapsing of this Ordinance is a setback to the growth of the SEBI, which had been armed to cope with the large number of securities laws defaulters in our country. We can only hope that the positive effects of this Ordinance are not rendered meaningless and that an amendment is enacted giving the SEBI the necessary powers to effectively regulate our markets.

(Deeksha Singh is part of the faculty on


Our advice on SEBI’s Investment Advisers Regulations


June 17, 2013: On January 21, 2013, the SEBI notified the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013 (“IA Regulations”) to check the number of entities handing out advice to investors in an increasingly sophisticated financial market.

The IA Regulations require any person (bank, non-banking financial company, corporates, and individuals) who wants to act as an investment advisor to first obtain a certificate of registration from the SEBI. Once registered, an investment advisor must make various disclosures to the SEBI, including the fee received for advice and any conflicts of interest. To further address the issue of conflict, investment advisers will also have to separate their advisory services from other activities. An important provision of the IA Regulations is that an investment adviser cannot enter into transactions on its own account contrary to the advice given to clients for at least 15 days after the advice is given. The IA Regulations exempt a few individuals from registration including insurance agents giving investment advice solely on insurance products.

The IA Regulations are a step in the right direction, but there are still some key issues that need resolution, including the commission-based sales of financial products. The exclusion of insurance products from regulations that seek to protect investors is also a worrying loophole. Until there is an effective way of segregating the advisor end from the sales end, the regulator will also find it difficult to control mis-selling in an ever-increasing retail market. Advisors can be flippant, often failing to tailor the advice to the specific financial needs and abilities of a particular customer.

From an investor’s point of view, the best way of taking your financial future and security in your own hands is to take investment advice with a pinch of salt, without relying exclusively on regulatory protection. For now, self-education and attention to paperwork at the time of taking a particular financial product may be the best approach to any investment.

(Deeksha Singh is part of the faculty on

To learn more about SEBI Regulations, check out’s online learning programme on Securities Laws.