Skip to the content
myLaw Blogthe myLaw.net blog
  • Courses
  • Corporate
  • Litigation
  • Lounge
  • Specialised
  • Courses
  • Corporate
  • Litigation
  • Lounge
  • Specialised
Categories
Uncategorized

A million dollar goal celebration

  • Post author By admin
  • Post date July 6, 2013
  • No Comments on A million dollar goal celebration
A goal celebration, graphically represented. Image courtesy the U.K. Intellectual Property Office.
A goal celebration, graphically represented. Image courtesy the U.K. Intellectual Property Office.

Gareth Bale, the ace Welsh Tottenham Hotspurs midfielder, recently filed a successful trade mark application to benefit from his iconic goal celebration and shirt number. The application was filed on March 26, 2013 with the UK Intellectual Property Office.

Mr. Bale, in roaring form with 31 goals in the last season of the English Premier League, is rumoured to have inked a £85m deal to mave to Real Madrid this summer. This would place him in the same league as Bernabeu favourite Cristiano Ronaldo.

Mr. Bale is also following Mr. Ronaldo’s footsteps in creating a brand for himself. His trade mark “CR7” is used on Nike apparel and is also the name of his line of clothing boutiques. Similarly, Mr. Bale’s trade mark will also be used on apparel and other products.

Registration of celebrity trade marks is not a recent phenomenon. A host of sports stars, actors, and musicians have cashed in on their celebrity status to register their own symbols and logos. Logos such as “SRT” by Sachin Tendulkar, “RF” by Roger Federer, and the four symbols representing the members of Led Zeppelin are prime examples. Shah Rukh Khan has reportedly applied to register the symbol “SRK” as a trade mark. Also, director Vidhu Vinod Chopra took Mr. Tendulkar’s permission before he used the symbol “SRT” in his movie Ferarri Ki Sawaari.

Intellectual-Property-LawAccording to the Trade Marks Act, 1999, “trade mark” includes any label, name, word, letters, numeral, brand that can be graphically represented and can distinguish the goods or services of one person from those of another.

A question that may arise now is whether another footballer, while celebrating a goal, can use Mr. Bale’s method of celebration. If Indian trade mark law were applicable, the celebration would be valid because firstly, the footballer who is copying Mr. Bale’s celebratory style is not providing any goods or services at that moment, and secondly, his method of celebration is neither graphically represented nor commercially exploited. However, if another footballer or any other person uses Bale’s logo on other goods or gestures the same symbol in advertisements without his permission, then it would amount to infringement.

So the next time Mr. Bale scores for Tottenham or even Real Madrid, remember that his celebration is worth millions.

(Samar Jha is a member of the faculty on myLaw.net.)

email
  • Tags celebrity logo, intellectual property, trade mark

← Sports lawyer Daniel Geey analyses UEFA’s Financial Fair Play Regulations → Why the DOMA decision matters – A view from outside the SCOTUS building on June 24

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay in touch

Read from our archives

  • Where process is punishment: Supreme Court shows how additional police powers in terror laws encourage injustice
  • State of Karnataka v. Azad Coach
  • Organise into self-governing groups, NLU students, and influence decisions in your college
  • Sports, debating, fests - there's always something happening at law school
  • On Shreya Singhal: Section 66A is too broad, vague, and will chill free speech
  • Supreme Court's sexual harassment regulations should not be limited to the Court's precincts
  • Speedy justice versus court vacations: A false dilemma
  • Rigorous scrutiny of process of distributing natural resources: "Coalgate" judgment advances Supreme Court jurisprudence
  • Pre-BALCO arbitration agreements with foreign seat: SC decision does little to improve clarity on Part 1 exclusion
  • Competence and legitimacy: The Supreme Court’s opinions on the distribution of natural resources
  • A judgment very much in error — Part 1 (Equality)
  • The truth about mooting
  • What are we here for?
  • How will you respond to the absence of parental control?
  • 21 years later — The unfortunate legacy of Indra Sawhney
  • Kheema Matar and lassi at Triveni
  • Supreme Court correctly holds National Tax Tribunal unconstitutional but should ordinary law be tested against basic structure and constitutional convention?
  • [Video] Labour law amendment proposals show government's anti-labour direction: Colin Gonsalves
  • A valid reason - On constitutionalism and the removal of governors
  • Supreme Court's pragmatic approach shields right to education amendments from basic structure challenge

More posts: Supreme Court of India legal education

© 2023 the myLaw.net blog

Powered by WordPress

To the top ↑ Up ↑